Eagles are thieves and steal food from other animals. They have a bad
moral character and are not as worthy or noble as the native bird the
Wild Turkey.
-Benjamin Franklin, a founding father, french lover and true patriot.
***
Whoever made the choice of the eagle as the national mascot, saw only the
outward suggestion of freedom in the bird's soaring flight, without
carefully looking into its actual character or behavour. It's a lot like
marrying someone because they are attractive and then finding out the awful
truth about their personality after it's too late.
Even though by appearances it's really just a big rodent, Canadians chose to
see themselves as beavers; clever, industrious, playful, but still quietly
goes about it's own business.
Too often we make choices in these United States based on outward
appearances and opportunism. In the end, sad but true, the eagle turns out
to be the more accurate representation of the American character. It will
readily resort to piracy if its food supply gets tight. I suppose you could
say the bird it steals the fish from. experiences some sort of "freedom,"
Saying the bird that goes without lunch experiences "democracy," might be a
stretch.
http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v087n02/p0246-p0251.pdf
Maybe someday the American people will experience a burst of illtellectual
honestly and admit that the American military is really in Iraq to
strategically control the oil reserves there. They might also have the
insight that this strategic control is much more to the benefit of the
multinational oil companies than it is to the American people themselves.
If Americans had adopted the beaver as their national mascot, they might be
heavily investing in ocean tidal dams, individually owned wind-power and
solar panels by now, rendering the middle east and its fossil fuel
resources irrelevant. But I'm afraid Americans just aren't that smart.
Fact is, they seem a little bird-brained. <grin>
Joe Blow