New Jersey Court Rules: Race Mixing 'Imperative'

[S. L'Gree]

"Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
news:***@news.giganews.com...
>
> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> >
> >
>
> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.

It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.

[XC_22-188-16]

S. L'Gree wrote:

> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> news:***@news.giganews.com...
>>
>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
>
> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.

Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.

[Roger]

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:

>S. L'Gree wrote:

>> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
>> news:***@news.giganews.com...

>>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
>>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?

>>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.

>> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.

>Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.

Really? Your proof of this is ... ?

Or don't you "buy into" the squeezable softness like you "don't buy
into" radioactive decay?

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@4ax.com>,
Roger <***@.> wrote:

> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
> in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
>
> >S. L'Gree wrote:
>
> >> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> >> news:***@news.giganews.com...
>
> >>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> >>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
>
> >>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
>
> >> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
>
> >Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
>
> Really? Your proof of this is ... ?

http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958

If you live in a house with posh sanitation facilities, it
may be difficult believing that a majority of people in poor countries
dont have access to toilets. Many adults in most of the worlds poorest
countries have never used toilet tissue.

Last July, at the African Sanitation and Hygiene Conference
held in South Africa, it was disclosed that over 300
million Africans do not have access to basic sanitation and
hygiene; this number has increased by 70 million since the
year 1990.
[...]

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Roger]

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
in message
<prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:

>In article <***@4ax.com>,
> Roger <***@.> wrote:

>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
>> in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:

>> >S. L'Gree wrote:

>> >> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
>> >> news:***@news.giganews.com...

>> >>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
>> >>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?

>> >>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.

>> >> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.

>> >Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.

>> Really? Your proof of this is ... ?

>http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958

Which says nothing about these people's knowledge of Charmin or lack
thereof, nor does it cover all of Africa.

Care to try again, or will you just admit that pathetic lying ignorant
little tommie was lying?

Again.

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@4ax.com>,
Roger <***@.> wrote:

> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
> in message
> <prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:
>
> >In article <***@4ax.com>,
> > Roger <***@.> wrote:
>
> >> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> >> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> >> someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
> >> in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
>
> >> >S. L'Gree wrote:
>
> >> >> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> >> >> news:***@news.giganews.com...
>
> >> >>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> >> >>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
>
> >> >>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
>
> >> >> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
>
> >> >Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
>
> >> Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
>
> >http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
>
> Which says nothing about these people's knowledge of Charmin or lack
> thereof, nor does it cover all of Africa.
>
> Care to try again, or will you just admit that pathetic lying ignorant
> little tommie was lying?

We all know he was being sarcastic.
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Roger]

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
in message
<prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:

>In article <***@4ax.com>,
> Roger <***@.> wrote:
>
>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
>> in message
>> <prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:
>>
>> >In article <***@4ax.com>,
>> > Roger <***@.> wrote:
>>
>> >> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> >> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> >> someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
>> >> in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:

>> >> >Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.

>> >> Really? Your proof of this is ... ?

>> >http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
>>
>> Which says nothing about these people's knowledge of Charmin or lack
>> thereof, nor does it cover all of Africa.
>>
>> Care to try again, or will you just admit that pathetic lying ignorant
>> little tommie was lying?

>We all know he was being sarcastic.

Then why did you even *try* to provide the proof I requested?

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@4ax.com>,
Roger <***@.> wrote:

> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
> in message
> <prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:
>
> >In article <***@4ax.com>,
> > Roger <***@.> wrote:
> >
> >> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> >> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> >> someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
> >> in message
> >> <prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:
> >>
> >> >In article <***@4ax.com>,
> >> > Roger <***@.> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> >> >> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> >> >> someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
> >> >> in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
>
> >> >> >Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
>
> >> >> Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
>
> >> >http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
> >>
> >> Which says nothing about these people's knowledge of Charmin or lack
> >> thereof, nor does it cover all of Africa.
> >>
> >> Care to try again, or will you just admit that pathetic lying ignorant
> >> little tommie was lying?
>
> >We all know he was being sarcastic.
>
> Then why did you even *try* to provide the proof I requested?

Because I think it's hilarious that, what was it, 300 million? Africans
don't use toilet paper.
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Roger]

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Perfesser White wrote
in message
<prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>:

>In article <***@4ax.com>,
> Roger <***@.> wrote:


>> >> >> >Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.

>> >> >> Really? Your proof of this is ... ?

>> >> >http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
>> >>
>> >> Which says nothing about these people's knowledge of Charmin or lack
>> >> thereof, nor does it cover all of Africa.
>> >>
>> >> Care to try again, or will you just admit that pathetic lying ignorant
>> >> little tommie was lying?

>> >We all know he was being sarcastic.

>> Then why did you even *try* to provide the proof I requested?

>Because I think it's hilarious that, what was it, 300 million? Africans
>don't use toilet paper.

Hilarious that people are so poor that they cannot afford toilet
paper?

That's a sick sense of humour you have there...

[Bob LeChevalier]

Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote:

>http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
>
>If you live in a house with posh sanitation facilities, it
>may be difficult believing that a majority of people in poor countries
>dont have access to toilets. Many adults in most of the worlds poorest
>countries have never used toilet tissue.
>
>Last July, at the African Sanitation and Hygiene Conference
>held in South Africa, it was disclosed that over 300
>million Africans do not have access to basic sanitation and
>hygiene; this number has increased by 70 million since the
>year 1990.
>[...]

http://www.euromonitor.com/Disposable_Paper_Products_in_South_Africa
reporting that t.p. and other such products are a luxury for economic
reasons. Not that they are unknown or not used, but they are too
expensive for regular use.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/sipa/REGIONAL/IAS/newsletter/news00/lunchSeminars.html
>In the 1990's, the government began to support small-scale toilet
> paper, soap and construction-related industries to build up the
> domestic supply and reduce the level of external dependency. Around
> 1995, Nigerian entrepreneurs started producing toilet paper in
> Nigeria rather than importing it. The toilet paper industry, which
> relies on recycled paper supplies, also created a Nigerian recycling
> paper industry. This trend demonstrates real micro-level development.

That they don't have basic sanitation facilities does not mean that
they don't have toilet paper, much less that they have never used it.

lojbab
--
lojbab ***@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org

[Gray Shockley]

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:54:25 -0500, S. L'Gree wrote
(in article <cfre1h$2j7h$***@news.utel.net.ua>):

> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> news:***@news.giganews.com...
>>
>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
>>> Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
>
> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
>
>

Aw, phooey; that's not any good.

How many generations of incestuous inbreeding (I'm using a redundancy
in case you might know one of the two words) did it take to produce a
silly, cowardly, sniveling piece of trash like you, Boy?

As Nancy Reagan said about your "very special friends": "Just say no."


You - as a gutless wonder - are becoming more and more of a bore all
the time, especially because you post under so many aliases. I guess
that's another advantage for you to use your nom d'un lâche. And that's
understandable because even you - as far away from a healthy human,
physically as well as psychologically as you - might still be coherent
enough - once in a while - to not like being laughed at as you are.



Gray Shockley
--------------------------
"Swinehood hath no remedy." - Sidney Lanier

[S. L'Gree]

"Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
news:***@news.giganews.com...
> How many generations of incestuous inbreeding (I'm using a redundancy
> in case you might know one of the two words) did it take to produce a
> silly, cowardly, sniveling piece of trash like you, Boy?

How many infusions of European did it take before someone like yourself
could utter more than just "whassup"?

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:54:25 -0500, S. L'Gree wrote
> (in article <cfre1h$2j7h$***@news.utel.net.ua>):
>
> > "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> > news:***@news.giganews.com...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> >>> Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
> >
> > It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
> >
> >
>
> Aw, phooey; that's not any good.

http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958

If you live in a house with posh sanitation facilities, it
may be difficult believing that a
majority of people in poor countries dont have access to
toilets. Many adults in most of the worlds poorest
countries have never used toilet tissue.

Last July, at the African Sanitation and Hygiene Conference
held in South Africa, it was disclosed that over 300
million Africans do not have access to basic sanitation and
hygiene; this number has increased by 70 million since the
year 1990.
[...]

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[SPQR]

Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote in message news:<prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>...
> In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
> Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:54:25 -0500, S. L'Gree wrote
> > (in article <cfre1h$2j7h$***@news.utel.net.ua>):
> >
> > > "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> > > news:***@news.giganews.com...
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> > >>> Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
> > >
> > > It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Aw, phooey; that's not any good.
>
> http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
>
> If you live in a house with posh sanitation facilities, it
> may be difficult believing that a
> majority of people in poor countries dont have access to
> toilets. Many adults in most of the worlds poorest
> countries have never used toilet tissue.
>
> Last July, at the African Sanitation and Hygiene Conference
> held in South Africa, it was disclosed that over 300
> million Africans do not have access to basic sanitation and
> hygiene; this number has increased by 70 million since the
> year 1990.
> [...]
>


Which proves what?

And before you answer that, let's remind you of the thousands of
families who do not have indoor plumbing or clean water in central
Appalachia, the Mississippi Delta, and the concentration camps where
Native Americans live (you may know them as "reservations").


>>>>
SPQR
<<<<



> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
> <><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@posting.google.com>,
***@hotmail.com (SPQR) wrote:

> Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote in message
> news:<prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>...
> > In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
> > Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:54:25 -0500, S. L'Gree wrote
> > > (in article <cfre1h$2j7h$***@news.utel.net.ua>):
> > >
> > > > "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> > > > news:***@news.giganews.com...
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> > > >>> Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
> > > >
> > > > It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Aw, phooey; that's not any good.
> >
> > http://www.nigeria-aids.org/msgRead.cfm?ID=958
> >
> > If you live in a house with posh sanitation facilities, it
> > may be difficult believing that a
> > majority of people in poor countries dont have access to
> > toilets. Many adults in most of the worlds poorest
> > countries have never used toilet tissue.
> >
> > Last July, at the African Sanitation and Hygiene Conference
> > held in South Africa, it was disclosed that over 300
> > million Africans do not have access to basic sanitation and
> > hygiene; this number has increased by 70 million since the
> > year 1990.
> > [...]
> >
> Which proves what?

That 300 million Africans don't use toilet paper, and the primitive conditions that accompany this:

http://reuters.com/news_article.jhtml;jsessionid=
2SNLZPEZ4GEGSCRBAE0CFFA?type=humannews&StoryID=1414213#

"For most people here (Nairobi), the "flying toilets" are the only way
of answering nature's call: you simply use a plastic bag, then fling it
as far out of sight as possible."

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/
science/nature/2808793.stm

"Possibly the most shocking thing we found was the number of urban
dwellers who rely on open defecation," he said.

"They have no toilet. [...]

"In many cities in Africa, it's known as "flying toilets", because you
defecate in a plastic bag and then you throw it."


They won't even use a hole in the ground called an outhouse. Don't they
know any better, or do they just not give a damn?

>
> And before you answer that, let's remind you of the thousands of
> families who do not have indoor plumbing or clean water in central
> Appalachia, the Mississippi Delta, and the concentration camps where
> Native Americans live (you may know them as "reservations").

Which proves what, that they use outhouses?
Perfesser White


>
>
> >>>>
> SPQR
> <<<<

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Cary Kittrell]

In article <***@4ax.com> Roger <***@.> writes:
<
<In one age, called the Second Age by some,
< (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
< someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
< in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
<
<>S. L'Gree wrote:
<
<>> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
<>> news:***@news.giganews.com...
<
<>>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
<>>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
<
<>>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
<
<>> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
<
<>Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
<
<Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
<
<Or don't you "buy into" the squeezable softness like you "don't buy
<into" radioactive decay?


Well, that sounded interesting, so I went looking for a bit
of history.

It appears that your correspondent is so fearless in his
opinions and undaunted in his right to express them that
he not only hides behind an alias, he also sets the
no-archive flag as well. You can never be too safe, donchyaknow?


Why are so many of these racists cowards as well?


-- cary

[Perfesser White]

In article <cftcpb$a3h$***@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu>,
***@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:

> In article <***@4ax.com> Roger <***@.>
> writes:
> <
> <In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> < (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> < someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
> < in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
> <
> <>S. L'Gree wrote:
> <
> <>> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> <>> news:***@news.giganews.com...
> <
> <>>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> <>>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> <
> <>>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
> <
> <>> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
> <
> <>Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
> <
> <Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
> <
> <Or don't you "buy into" the squeezable softness like you "don't buy
> <into" radioactive decay?
>
>
> Well, that sounded interesting, so I went looking for a bit
> of history.
>
> It appears that your correspondent is so fearless in his
> opinions and undaunted in his right to express them that
> he not only hides behind an alias, he also sets the
> no-archive flag as well. You can never be too safe, donchyaknow?
>
>
> Why are so many of these racists cowards as well?
>
>
> -- cary

Cowards? I'll debate you, you sanctimonious, self-righteous twerp.
Does *anyone* need to identify themselves to exchange opinions on
Usenet? Please explain.
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Gray Shockley]

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:15, White Boy dined & whined:

> Cowards? I'll debate you, you sanctimonious, self-righteous twerp.
> Does *anyone* need to identify themselves to exchange opinions on
> Usenet? Please explain.
> Perfesser White


You appear to be an emotional and ethical
slut as well as a race whore.

You just seem to be such a little, morally bankrupt "near-human".

You need to understand, Punk, that those of us from the deep south are
very familiar with racists wearing white dresses and wearing duncecaps
who murder in the dead of the night and are gutless, worthless pieces
of offal.

I don't debate lower animals such as you because I don't recognize you
as being an equal as I don't recognize you as human.

Your "brothers in the dresses & dunce caps" long ago showed me what
trash such as them and trash such as you are and you don't get the
respect that humans do.

And that's not "ad hominem"; rather that's "against the boy".



Gray Shockley
--------------------------
"Swinehood hath no remedy." - Sidney Lanier

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:15, White Boy dined & whined:
>
> > Cowards? I'll debate you, you sanctimonious, self-righteous twerp.
> > Does *anyone* need to identify themselves to exchange opinions on
> > Usenet? Please explain.
> > Perfesser White
>
~~~~~ deleted irrelevant shit

Debate me:
Does *anyone* need to identify themselves to exchange opinions on
Usenet? Please explain...

you backwoods Mississippi, shack-dwelling, piece of shit coward.
Stay stupid,
Perfesser White


>
> Gray Shockley
> --------------------------
> "Swinehood hath no remedy." - Sidney Lanier

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Gray Shockley]

On Tue, 17 Aug, Doesn't Have The Equipment For That spewed:

> you backwoods Mississippi, shack-dwelling, piece of shit coward.
> Stay stupid,


Perfesser White Trash

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug, Doesn't Have The Equipment For That spewed:
>
> > you backwoods Mississippi, shack-dwelling, piece of shit coward.
> > Stay stupid,
>
>
> Perfesser White Trash

Run away, coward.
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Gray Shockley]

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:46:35 -0500, Cary Kittrell wrote
(in article <cftcpb$a3h$***@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu>):

> In article <***@4ax.com> Roger <***@.>
> writes:
> <
> <In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> < (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> < someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
> < in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
> <
> <>S. L'Gree wrote:
> <
> <>> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> <>> news:***@news.giganews.com...
> <
> <>>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> <>>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> <
> <>>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
> <
> <>> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
> <
> <>Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
> <
> <Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
> <
> <Or don't you "buy into" the squeezable softness like you "don't buy
> <into" radioactive decay?
>
>
> Well, that sounded interesting, so I went looking for a bit
> of history.
>
> It appears that your correspondent is so fearless in his
> opinions and undaunted in his right to express them that
> he not only hides behind an alias, he also sets the
> no-archive flag as well. You can never be too safe, donchyaknow?
>
>
> Why are so many of these racists cowards as well?
>
>
> -- cary
>
>

By definition.

++ Gray

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:46:35 -0500, Cary Kittrell wrote
> (in article <cftcpb$a3h$***@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu>):
>
> > In article <***@4ax.com> Roger <***@.>
> > writes:
> > <
> > <In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> > < (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> > < someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
> > < in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:
> > <
> > <>S. L'Gree wrote:
> > <
> > <>> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
> > <>> news:***@news.giganews.com...
> > <
> > <>>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
> > <>>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?
> > <
> > <>>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.
> > <
> > <>> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.
> > <
> > <>Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.
> > <
> > <Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
> > <
> > <Or don't you "buy into" the squeezable softness like you "don't buy
> > <into" radioactive decay?
> >
> >
> > Well, that sounded interesting, so I went looking for a bit
> > of history.
> >
> > It appears that your correspondent is so fearless in his
> > opinions and undaunted in his right to express them that
> > he not only hides behind an alias, he also sets the
> > no-archive flag as well. You can never be too safe, donchyaknow?
> >
> >
> > Why are so many of these racists cowards as well?
> >
> >
> > -- cary
> >
> >
>
> By definition.

And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet. Please explain.
I'm waiting, you coward.
Perfesser WHite

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Gray Shockley]

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:51, Perfesser White Trash wrote

> And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
> identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet.

In your case, Boy, it's because you're "pulling a Kluxer" - you're
hiding under your sheet and duncecap (is it true that you "boys" wear a
bra and panties under there?). However, in your case, I'd imagine you'd
need a girdle, too.

You don't take responsibility for what you write because you write
wearing your sheet and your duncecap and your bra and your girdle, boy.
Although, in your case, perhaps "boy" is all wrong for you.

> Please explain.

I just did, Mr Trash.

> I'm waiting, you coward.

Anyone can do a FOIA with DoD on me, Po Trash Boy.

Perfesser "I can try to run & I can try to hide" WHite

Po WHite Trash - he's 2/3rds white but you'd think he was made of mud.
Sort of an even stupider John Latrino Knight.

When Perfesser White Trash dies, no one will notice any difference.


Gray Shockley
--------------------------
Entropy Maintenance Technician
Tao Chemical Company
--------------------------
***@gmail.com
http://www.compcomm.com/
Vicksburg, Mississippi US

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:51, Perfesser White wrote
>
> > And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
> > identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet.
>
> In your case, Boy, it's because you're "pulling a Kluxer" - you're
> hiding under your sheet and duncecap (is it true that you "boys" wear a
> bra and panties under there?). However, in your case, I'd imagine you'd
> need a girdle, too.
>
> You don't take responsibility for what you write

I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Gray Shockley]

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:12:07 -0500, Perfesser White wrote
(in article
<prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>):

> In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
> Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:51, Perfesser White wrote
>>
>>> And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
>>> identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet.
>>
>> In your case, Boy, it's because you're "pulling a Kluxer" - you're
>> hiding under your sheet and duncecap (is it true that you "boys" wear a
>> bra and panties under there?). However, in your case, I'd imagine you'd
>> need a girdle, too.
>>
>> You don't take responsibility for what you write
>
> I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?

Your betters. And there are millions and millions of them.


Perfesser Po' White Trash
>


Gray Shockley
--------------------------------------------------------
With apologies to the dead astronomer (dfa).

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:12:07 -0500, Perfesser White wrote
> (in article
> <prof.white-***@cosmos.uncensored-news.com>):
>
> > In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
> > IQ-85 Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:51, Perfesser White wrote
> >>
> >>> And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
> >>> identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet.
> >>
> >> In your case, Boy, it's because you're "pulling a Kluxer" - you're
> >> hiding under your sheet and duncecap (is it true that you "boys" wear a
> >> bra and panties under there?). However, in your case, I'd imagine you'd
> >> need a girdle, too.
> >>
> >> You don't take responsibility for what you write
> >
> > I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?
>
> Your betters. And there are millions and millions of them.

This is your opinion, ya IQ-85 dullard, or is it written down somewhere in an official Usenet
rule book?
Stay stupid,
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Bob LeChevalier]

Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote:
>In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
> Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:51, Perfesser White wrote
>>
>> > And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
>> > identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet.
>>
>> In your case, Boy, it's because you're "pulling a Kluxer" - you're
>> hiding under your sheet and duncecap (is it true that you "boys" wear a
>> bra and panties under there?). However, in your case, I'd imagine you'd
>> need a girdle, too.
>>
>> You don't take responsibility for what you write
>
>I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?

To yourself.

That's his point - you don't TAKE responsibility for what you write,
which would require that you identify yourself.

You don't believe in what you write sufficiently to stand up for it
publicly, uncovered by your white sheet. You are a coward who hides
behind a falsie.

lojbab
--
lojbab ***@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <***@lojban.org> wrote:

> Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote:
> >In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
> > Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:51, Perfesser White wrote
> >>
> >> > And if you're not a coward, you'll debate here why *anyone* needs to
> >> > identify themselves to exchange opinions on Usenet.
> >>
> >> In your case, Boy, it's because you're "pulling a Kluxer" - you're
> >> hiding under your sheet and duncecap (is it true that you "boys" wear a
> >> bra and panties under there?). However, in your case, I'd imagine you'd
> >> need a girdle, too.
> >>
> >> You don't take responsibility for what you write
> >
> >I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?
>
> To yourself.

What pious nonsense. Whose axiom is that?

>
> That's his point - you don't TAKE responsibility for what you write,
> which would require that you identify yourself.

LOL, where is that in the official Usenet rule book, or is that merely your opinion?
My name is Bob LeChevalier. Are you satisfied now, idiot?

>
> You don't believe in what you write sufficiently to stand up for it
> publicly, uncovered by your white sheet.

Meet Bob Le Chevrolet, the newly appointed "Conscience of Usenet".

> You are a coward who hides behind a falsie.

Oh, like 90% of Usenet posters, huh? Are they all cowards to? Idiot.
Stay stupid,
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Bob LeChevalier]

Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote:
>> >I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?
>>
>> To yourself.
>
>What pious nonsense. Whose axiom is that?

The world's, racist.

>> That's his point - you don't TAKE responsibility for what you write,
>> which would require that you identify yourself.
>
>LOL, where is that in the official Usenet rule book, or is that merely your opinion?

There is no "official Usenet rule book".

There is an etiquette of polite society. You don't follow it.

There are principles for recognizing character. Someone who does not
sign their editorials is a coward.

>My name is Bob LeChevalier. Are you satisfied now, idiot?

I'm satisfied that you are a liar.

>> You don't believe in what you write sufficiently to stand up for it
>> publicly, uncovered by your white sheet.
>
>Meet Bob Le Chevrolet, the newly appointed "Conscience of Usenet".

I don't need to be a conscience. I am merely pointing out to you what
the rest of the world sees: a coward hidden by his white sheet.

>> You are a coward who hides behind a falsie.
>
>Oh, like 90% of Usenet posters, huh?

I think that statistic is as bogus as most of yours.

>Are they all cowards to?

If they don't sign their posts, yes.

lojbab
--
lojbab ***@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@4ax.com>,
Bob LeChevalier <***@lojban.org> wrote:

> Perfesser White <***@whiteuniv.org> wrote:
> >> >I'm responsible to whom, you IQ-85 dullard?
> >>
> >> To yourself.
> >
> >What pious nonsense. Whose axiom is that?
>
> The world's, racist.

LOL. Cite, please?

>
> >> That's his point - you don't TAKE responsibility for what you write,
> >> which would require that you identify yourself.
> >
> >LOL, where is that in the official Usenet rule book, or is that merely your
> >opinion?
>
> There is no "official Usenet rule book".
>
> There is an etiquette of polite society. You don't follow it.

Can you provide a cite for your platitudes? Or are these just Bobby LeChevrolet's opinions?

>
> There are principles for recognizing character. Someone who does not
> sign their editorials is a coward.

Cite please, or just more opinion? I'm getting tired of having to ask!

>
> >My name is Bob LeChevalier. Are you satisfied now, idiot?
>
> I'm satisfied that you are a liar.

And I'm satisfied that you're a fool who can't back up his argument.

>
> >> You don't believe in what you write sufficiently to stand up for it
> >> publicly, uncovered by your white sheet.
> >
> >Meet Bob Le Chevrolet, the newly appointed "Conscience of Usenet".
>
> I don't need to be a conscience. I am merely pointing out to you what
> the rest of the world sees: a coward hidden by his white sheet.

Just name calling, nothing else? No official cites for reference? How is a person to keep all of the unwritten rules straight?

>
> >> You are a coward who hides behind a falsie.
> >
> >Oh, like 90% of Usenet posters, huh?
>
> I think that statistic is as bogus as most of yours.

Then you tell us, Mr. Prig of Usenet, what % of Usenet posters use a nym? And how do we know you're not using a nym? Why don't you post your driver's license with your pic and Social
Security number here so we can verify who you say you are, else you're
just a coward, right? I mean, anyone can claim to be "Bob LeChevalier" on Usenet- someone else already did.


>
> >Are they all cowards to?
>
> If they don't sign their posts, yes.
>
> lojbab

Do you always get mad when you can't dictate the rules, Chevy?
Laughing at the stupidity of your futile argument,
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Gray Shockley]

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:12, Perfesser White Trash wrote:

> Stay stupid,
> Perfesser White


Oh, I think he will.



Gray Shockley
--------------------------
"Swinehood hath no remedy." - Sidney Lanier

[Perfesser White]

In article <***@news.giganews.com>,
Gray Shockley <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:12, Perfesser White Trash wrote:
>
> > Stay stupid,
> > Perfesser White
>
>
> Oh, I think he will.

That's it? All you got, boy?
Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

[Roger]

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Cary Kittrell wrote
in message <cftcpb$a3h$***@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu>:

>In article <***@4ax.com> Roger <***@.> writes:

><In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>< (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>< someone claiming to be XC_22-188-16 wrote
>< in message <***@BackDooR-Networks>:

><>S. L'Gree wrote:

><>> "Gray Shockley" <***@cybercoffee.org> wrote in message
><>> news:***@news.giganews.com...

><>>> On Mon, 16Aug, Perfesser White wrote:
><>>> > Why is it that Blacks benefit by being around Whites?

><>>> They learn that only white wackos squeeze the Charmin.

><>> It took a White *whacko* to teach the kaffirs what Charmin is for.

><>Many in Africa today still have no idea what Charmin if for.

><Really? Your proof of this is ... ?
><
><Or don't you "buy into" the squeezable softness like you "don't buy
><into" radioactive decay?

>Well, that sounded interesting, so I went looking for a bit
>of history.
>
>It appears that your correspondent is so fearless in his
>opinions and undaunted in his right to express them that
>he not only hides behind an alias, he also sets the
>no-archive flag as well. You can never be too safe, donchyaknow?
>
>Why are so many of these racists cowards as well?

Yes, but no-archive doesn't help if his complete post is included, as
I did in my response to him -- as I generally do, to make sure that
zir idiocy and cowardice are recorded for posterity. I have offered
to teach lying little tommie what zie needs to know to prevent this
from happening, if zie will only ask nicely.

But then, one would think that the 133t ski11z zie continuously crows
about would have already revealed that secret to zie, if one weren't
already aware that lying little tommie could not make a distinction
between a OS, a shell and a communications program (or between those
and a set of security protocols and utilities, nor even correctly
identify the newsreader zie was posting with -- that time he accused
another poster, apparently at random, of canceling zir posts...)

BTW, the relevant citation is here:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=2e29ab3c8448b8e1fe88e134e505ece1%40news.teranews.com&output=gplain

<quote>

Message-ID: <***@news.teranews.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:45:56 GMT
From: Roger <***@.>
Newsgroups:
alt.parenting.solutions,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.math,alt.revisionism
Subject: Hey, lying little tommie: why are you continuing to run from
this?
References: <***@mb-m23.aol.com>
<***@mb-m17.aol.com>
<40ec0b6f$***@galaxy.uncensored-news.com> <***@FreeBSD>
<***@news.teranews.com>
<***@FreeBSD>
<***@news.teranews.com>
<***@FreeBSD>
<***@news.teranews.com>

<snip to>

>I don't buy into this "Half-Life" radioactive decay either.

What, specifically, about the well documented and proven phenomena
known as radioactive decay, or the measurement thereof known as half
life do you "not buy into," and on what basis?

<quote>

QUite predictably, lying little tommie ran away...